Chessy
The French Defense: King's Indian Attack, Franco-Hiva Gambit (Black)
After 1.e4 e6 2.d3, White has avoided the main French lines — but you can immediately take the fight to them with 2...f5, the Franco-Hiva Gambit. You offer White a kingside pawn tension very early. The engine rates this +0.83, a clear edge for White, meaning you are the one fighting for equality from the start. But the real story is in the statistics: across over 18,000 games you score a respectable 45.3% as Black, and many of White's popular replies are actually inaccurate. This page shows you exactly how to handle the critical moments.
Play the French Defense: King's Indian Attack, Franco-Hiva Gambit against the engine
Free, no signup — you play black, the engine adapts to your level.
Ready to test these lines? Play the position as Black against a training engine that adapts to your moves. Create a free account to track your progress.
Create a free account →What You're Fighting For
The Franco-Hiva Gambit is a provocative choice. By playing 2...f5, you challenge White's centre before they have fully claimed it. If White advances with e5, you get a kingside grip; if they capture exf5, you open the f-file for your rook while keeping a solid pawn on e6. Your goal is to undermine White's centre and create imbalances early. The engine gives +0.83, a clear edge for White, so you are under pressure — but this is not a losing position. With accurate play you can neutralise that advantage, and as the statistics show, White makes mistakes more often than you might expect.
The Engine's Best Reply
Strongest for White according to Stockfish is 3.Nf3. After that the main continuation runs 3...d5 4.exf5 exf5. This leads to an open centre with symmetrical pawn structures and active piece play. In this line White scores just 49.3% across 1,863 games — actually below average for White — which tells you that you are holding your own when the opponent chooses the top engine move. Your plan is straightforward: develop your pieces naturally (Be7, Nf6, 0-0, then decide whether to target the d3 pawn or expand on the kingside).
Capitalising on White's Most Common Mistakes
The most popular move in the position is 3.exf5 (6,825 games), but it scores only 50.3% for White — barely above parity. That gives you good chances. The two real gifts, though, are these known inaccuracies: - 3.e5 (1,585 games, White scores 51.9%): This is an inaccuracy that loses about 0.7 pawns of advantage. After 3.e5, you gain kingside space and can follow up with ...d6, attacking the pawn chain. - 3.f3 (1,050 games, White scores 43.4%): This is a genuine mistake costing about 1.0 pawns. White weakens the kingside and blocks their own best developing square. If you see 3.f3, you are already better — simply continue developing and prepare ...d5. Both of these are gifts that push the evaluation firmly in your direction.
What the Bigger Statistics Reveal
Looking at all 18,182 games from the starting position of the gambit, the overall results are: - White wins: 50.5% - Draws: 4.3% - Black wins: 45.3% That 45.3% win rate for Black is excellent for a position where the engine says White is clearly better. It means that in practical play, the Franco-Hiva Gambit is a dangerous weapon. White's job is harder than the numbers suggest. Note also the low draw rate — this opening almost always produces a decisive result, making it a great choice if you want a fighting game rather than a quiet manoeuvring battle.
Results across 18,182 Lichess games
| Most-played continuation | Games | White wins |
|---|---|---|
| exf5 | 6,825 | 50.3% |
| Nc3 | 2,839 | 52.2% |
| Nf3 | 1,863 | 49.3% |
| e5 | 1,585 | 51.9% |
| f3 | 1,050 | 43.4% |
| Nd2 | 724 | 57.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is the Franco-Hiva Gambit sound for Black?
It's a sharp, offbeat choice. Stockfish evaluates it at +0.83, a clear edge for White, so you are technically worse against perfect play. But in practice, Black scores 45.3% across over 18,000 games, and many of White's most common replies are inaccurate or outright mistakes.
What's the difference between 2...f5 and the standard French Defense?
The standard French (2.d4 d5) leads to a closed centre and long-term positional battles. The Franco-Hiva Gambit (2.d3 f5) is much sharper — you attack White's centre immediately, and the game often opens up quickly. The trade-off is that you accept a slight disadvantage (+0.83) in exchange for unbalanced, aggressive play.
How should I respond if White plays 3.e5?
3.e5 is an inaccuracy that loses about 0.7 pawns of advantage. You should be happy with this move. Your plan is to attack the pawn chain with ...d6, undermining the e5 pawn. Develop your kingside pieces first and look to break open the centre on your terms.
Is 3.f3 really that bad for White?
Yes — 3.f3 is a mistake that costs White about 1.0 pawns. It weakens the kingside dark squares and blocks the knight's best developing square (f3). White scores just 43.4% from this move, meaning you are actually the favourite already. Simply develop and prepare ...d5.
What is Stockfish's evaluation of the French Defense: King's Indian Attack, Franco-Hiva Gambit?
At depth 16, Stockfish rates the French Defense: King's Indian Attack, Franco-Hiva Gambit as a slight advantage for White (+0.83) from White's perspective. This is the computer's assessment of the position after the main opening moves.